Lenovo 20QT002FMX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20QT002FMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QT002FMX
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 47
1-Core 72
2-Core 140
48% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 206
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 229F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 6
4% 6.07 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
920GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1257 1580 1451 1270 1299 1263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,299
Write 1,171
Mixed 982
SusWrite 1,353
271% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 263
193% 255 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 180%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20QT002FMX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20QT002FMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback