Asus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BR1100CKA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 121
49% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 117
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1792) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.2
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P900F128GH 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.7H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 326 364 156 114 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 468
Write 222
Mixed 276
SusWrite 231
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 10
40% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 65.6
87% 160 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback