GPU GWTN156-7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN156-7  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 93
2-Core 141
50% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 12.1
8% 11.1 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 12.9
11% 14.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800sh 256GB SSD 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08108W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 82 125 137 84 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 194
Write 121
Mixed 102
SusWrite 99.1
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 15.8
52% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 94.1
71% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 82%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 15 15 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
8.82% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 23.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 17.6
28% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.1
104% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.82%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 14.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 8.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN156-7 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN156-7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback