HP EliteDesk 800 G6 Desktop Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G6 Desktop Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 870F
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 09:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 628
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 870F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 8.9
5% 36.6 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.9
8% 10 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 1414 1595 1627 1632 1636 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,512
Write 1,972
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 1,578
365% 1,615 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 54
179% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 883
681% 914 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 254%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G6 Desktop Mini PC Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G6 Desktop Mini PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback