MSI X299-A PRO (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299-A PRO (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory35.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 00:38
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 1,015
89% 757 Pts
64-Core 2,072
128% 2,072 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Dell(1028 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 199
Parallax 217
160% 204 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 195
Splatting 151
160% 202 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 148%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
169GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,581
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,203
330% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 70.3
223% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 798
589% 786 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 269%
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80007E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 606 605 607 607 607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 827
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 636
226% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 49.7
174% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 672
534% 751 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 182%
Great: 215%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
601GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1553 461 90 87 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 665
256% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 67.6
221% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 833
572% 706 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 180%
Great: 299%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 32 35 35 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 115
Write 141
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 34.1
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
227% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 259 262 252 260 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 128GB
50GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 32 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 85.3
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 34.1
44% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
297% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 30.9
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 41.4
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XJ69DF-HYA 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 11.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299-A PRO (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299-A PRO (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback