Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 20:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 597
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 39
28% 39.9 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 38.9
37% 45.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 46 3.5 4.9 93 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 404
Write 292
Mixed 194
SusWrite 75.2
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 9.2
47% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 42.3
47% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 55%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
341GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 93.6
Write 108
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 118
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
78GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 50.9
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 51.4
42% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
219GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 139 140 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 129
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 139
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston 9905678-041.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $741
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback