HP Pro3500 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pro3500 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 420
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370X
PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB
CLim: 1140 MHz, MLim: 1458 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 39
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 54.6
32% 45.1 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 28
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 132 132 160 133 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 255
Write 239
Mixed 208
SusWrite 140
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 30.5
107% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro3500 Series Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro3500 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback