Gigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 291
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,107
99% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,881
116% 1,881 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 243
Parallax 275
222% 263 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 231
Splatting 171
185% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M480 1TB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 990 1078 1112 790 694 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 1,838
Mixed 1,611
SusWrite 975
325% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.7
184% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,198
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 1063
795% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 216%
Great: 481%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 13
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER - $430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback