Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 15:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 720
77% 616 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 82.5
72% 86.8 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 70.3
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 242
Mixed 118
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 13.7
45% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 41.4
44% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 52%
Kodak X150 240GB
195GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 202 70 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 457
Write 358
Mixed 327
SusWrite 145
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 33.9
144% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 196
174% 258 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 106 107 115 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 156
Write 156
Mixed 98
SusWrite 116
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
53GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 2
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 17.9
18% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
120% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 G.SKILL F4-2666C19-8GNT 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 29.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 27.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $242
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback