Lenovo 81FB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 11:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 141
54% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 224
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 540
Legend(17AA 3803) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 18.8
0% 12.7 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 18.7
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 30 29 29 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 72.9
Write 81.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 29.7
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8ATF25664HZ-2G6B1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 13
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FB Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback