Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 11:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 56.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 232
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 608
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 28.8
15% 20.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
120g SSD 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001C81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 360
Mixed 313
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 20.1
71% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 64.3
50% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 10.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback