Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 05:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 146
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 440
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3559) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 51.7
Parallax 45.8
29% 44.3 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 33.8
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A480G 480GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 206 203 208 200 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 371
Write 246
Mixed 248
SusWrite 197
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 20.7
72% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 91.8
81% 125 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 110 112 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 103
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 108
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 68%
Generic External 128GB
70GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 168 163 162 169 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 175
Mixed 177
SusWrite 159
242% 183 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 15.9
1,444% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 18.9
1,971% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 147%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback