bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System
Motherboard	Intel DX79SR
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	MCO-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265 2,165 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 112 2-Core 223 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 548 58% 462 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 19.2 18% 20.6 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 15.8 Splatting 11.8 11% 14 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 427 Write 275 Mixed 308 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 31 108% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 184 166% 251 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 141 Write 144 Mixed 97 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0639 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 21.6 Write 6.5 Mixed 6 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B485831383636433944332F3447582020 4x4GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 36.2 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 14.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,027x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,571x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	935x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,042x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16