Asus F2A85-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 119
52% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 166
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8526) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.5
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.2
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 97 117 121 76 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28% Poor
Read 96.4
Write 196
Mixed 186
SusWrite 103
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 11
40% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 155
109% 138 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
341GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 104 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.1
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 105
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A2133C11 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback