bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1718 x 878 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 90.8
34% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 85.3
9% 74.4 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.1
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 43GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 639
Write 609
Mixed 583
136% 610 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 25
82% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 110
84% 116 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback