Lenovo 30A2S06M00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A2S06M00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 14:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 174
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 378
44% 343 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600
Legend(17AA 30A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.6
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 317 335 244 232 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 404
Write 325
Mixed 345
SusWrite 281
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 20.6
70% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 117
106% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9P1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A2S06M00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30A2S06M00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback