Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,039
99% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,349
84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 248
Parallax 273
216% 262 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 227
Splatting 169
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1333 1487 1406 1608 1477 1520 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,811
Write 1,493
Mixed 881
SusWrite 1,472
317% 1,414 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 68.8
202% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 952
614% 717 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 253%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 40.7
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 40.6
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $710
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback