Samsung 532U3C/532U4C/532U3X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 532U3C/532U4C/532U3X  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U3C-KD1BR
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 00:57
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 109
50% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 161
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 50 63 41 48 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 10.7
Write 105
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 49.6
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 61%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
50GB free, PID dd35
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 30 29 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 133
Write 37.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 19
70% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 1.7
137% 5.35 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 532U3C/532U4C/532U3X Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 532U3C/532U4C/532U3X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback