PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110623 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '22 at 21:20 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 269 270 284 285 286 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
482GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 155 157 159 159 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-13330 CL9-9-9 DDR3-13330 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 5x |
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 2x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 2x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $111 |