MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive423% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 265
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 936
87% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 66.9
57% 69.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 65.4
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3398 3506 3180 1595 1038 693 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
423% Outstanding
Read 3,851
Write 2,767
Mixed 2,394
SusWrite 2,235
628% 2,812 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 84.8
281% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 970
735% 993 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 423%
Great: 463%
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 365 370 367 368 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 370
Mixed 316
SusWrite 367
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 44.9
153% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 215
164% 222 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 120%
Samsung 860 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 461 463 459 449 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 459
Mixed 422
SusWrite 442
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 51
164% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Samsung MZNLF128 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: FXT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 130 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 469
Write 132
Mixed 167
SusWrite 130
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 23.4
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 56.6
54% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
919GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 202 202 202 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 195
Mixed 70
SusWrite 202
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 33.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 31.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback