Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '22 at 16:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 119
2-Core 115
68% 106 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 140
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 58.3
48% 60 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 57.4
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 227
Mixed 259
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 31.2
108% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 168
148% 222 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 351
Write 361
Mixed 345
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 25.2
82% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 63.1
38% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 17.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback