Asrock Z77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77M  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '22 at 13:31
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 350
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 17.6
12% 16.5 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 18
Splatting 15.5
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 72 135 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 428
Write 121
Mixed 360
SusWrite 84.3
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 38.3
140% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 146
140% 212 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
25GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 135 108 103 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 163
Write 151
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 122
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
29GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 143 153 141 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 95.5
Write 91.1
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 150
64% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
69GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 115 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 114
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-478.B00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77M Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback