Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 14:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 201
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 606
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.1% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 125
Parallax 110
92% 116 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 93
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
201GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 437 398 291 292 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 458
Mixed 437
SusWrite 358
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 58.9
206% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 69 100 108 115 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 96.4
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 112%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 1TB
835GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 118 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 119
128% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback