Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 488
45% 375 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 8406) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 44.5
25% 37.2 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 36.2
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C400-mtf DDAK256MAM 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 229 151 112 116 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 352
Write 253
Mixed 244
SusWrite 160
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 13.9
69% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 22.7
41% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 71%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
397GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 115
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 122
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
2TB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 193 196 198 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 194
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M391B5173QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W520 POWER Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $706
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback