Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 119
52% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 191
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 139 170 161 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 398
Write 288
Mixed 265
SusWrite 136
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 21.5
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 223
192% 285 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 128%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
658GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 79 88 86 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 30.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 76.4
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 86%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
14GB free, PID dd1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.1 0.1 12 25 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 156
Write 30
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 10.2
51% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8WM9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback