Alienware x14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive575% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAlienware x14  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0T9XYP
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 10:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 71.1
1-Core 194
2-Core 382
111% 215 Pts
4-Core 718
8-Core 1,232
118% 975 Pts
64-Core 1,848
114% 1,848 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B13) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 148
Parallax 29.2
20% 67.1 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.3
6% 8.87 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4256 4315 3022 1364 1375 1393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
575% Outstanding
Read 5,004
Write 4,511
Mixed 3,026
SusWrite 2,621
848% 3,790 MB/s
4K Read 84.6
4K Write 336
4K Mixed 132
475% 184 MB/s
DQ Read 1,689
DQ Write 1388
DQ Mixed 1,493
1,130% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 575%
Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 54.4
MC Mixed 57.4
168% 58.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 30.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical x14 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Alienware x14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback