Biostar H61MHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 04:15
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 288
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 2
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 195 199 192 199 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.2% Above average
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 172
SusWrite 198
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 35.9
116% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 50.9
42% 58 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
0GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 101 99 88 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 88.3
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 8.7
9% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
90% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 14 60 84.6" 1680 1050 SAM0DF7 SAMSUNG
Typical H61MHV Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback