Biostar H61MHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H61MHV (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '22 at 00:21
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 159 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 274 38% 281 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 3030) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 446GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 154 Write 207 Mixed 177 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 37.6 119% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 85.4 DQ Mixed 51.9 42% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 834GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 81 79 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 62.2 Write 86.4 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 80.2 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 12.7 Write 2.2 Mixed 8.7 9% 7.87 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.5 97% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MHV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	24x
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	20x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	19x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	52x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	16x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	15x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
9905471-074.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 16GBKingstonBench 49%, 26 samples	10x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16