Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 167% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 166% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

24 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$300 20,824 User benchmarks, average bench 104% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 97.1 1-Core 162 2-Core 314 105% 191 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,067 100% 830 Pts	64-Core 1,528 95% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 111%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (229 fps cap detected)	164% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 229 Parallax 228 186% 228 fps	MRender 229 Gravity 227 Splatting 171 167% 209 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1881 1849 1582 1587 1482 1614 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,501 Write 2,137 Mixed 2,380 SusWrite 1,666 488% 2,171 MB/s	4K Read 65.2 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 61.8 202% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,120 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 293 298% 514 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 488%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 930GB free Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 381 377 365 362 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 457 Write 366 Mixed 288 SusWrite 366 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 26.4 86% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 147 116% 162 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 815GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 128 126 125 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 140 Write 129 Mixed 113 SusWrite 128 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 76%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 672GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 20 20 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 34.9 Mixed 27 SusWrite 21.1 39% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 43%
Maxtor OneTouch 300GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 279GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 34 33 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 35.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 34.2 42% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 29GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 18 20 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 9.2 Mixed 21 SusWrite 19.3 25% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.1 216% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3600C16-8GTZNC F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 32GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.9% Very good	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 29.8 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 28.8 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 50 80% 50 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	837x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	342x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,032

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16