Lenovo 20YQ003AUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20YQ003AUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20YQ003AUS
Memory8.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 59.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 236
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 718
69% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 69%
Great: 96%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22D8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 0.9
0% 23 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 22D8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 513.29
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 62.5
48% 63 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 56.5
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1629
Write 1,050
Mixed 366
222% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 45.3
155% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 729
550% 731 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E2 Kingston 9905744-077.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 29.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 13.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20YQ003AUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 20YQ003AUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback