Lenovo 20T4000KFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20T4000KFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T4000KFR
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201210
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 79%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 54.9
26% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 87.8
8-Core 127
13% 107 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 3.6
2% 4.5 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 622 492 574 691 790 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 806
Mixed 470
SusWrite 623
134% 589 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 37.7
124% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 188
174% 279 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 110%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN Ramaxel RMSA3330MJ78HBF-3200 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 22.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20T4000KFR Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T4000KFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback