Clevo P370EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemClevo P370EM  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P370EM
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 17:39
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 32
2-Core 60.8
35% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 165
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Clevo(1558 0371) 1.5GB
CLim: 597 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 433 435 411 400 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 397
Write 435
Mixed 344
SusWrite 417
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 152
116% 158 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 118%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
66GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 386
Write 414
Mixed 380
SusWrite 88
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 29.7
97% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 48.3
76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 91%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
28GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 107
Mixed 103
190% 188 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 2.6
831% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 3.1
1,140% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P370EM Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Clevo P370EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $515
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback