HP Laptop 15-ef0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86FD
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 00:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 29.3
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 127
40% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 391
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 86FD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 319 159 245 141 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 331
Mixed 142
SusWrite 230
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 41.8
129% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 342
266% 371 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 152%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston KHYXPX-MIE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 14.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 12.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 259
16% 259 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-ef0xxx Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback