Lenovo 30A8S0BU0M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A8S0BU0M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150313
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 621
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 2,623
162% 2,623 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 31.1
21% 28 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 23.9
22% 28 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 98 99 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 176
Write 108
Mixed 110
SusWrite 146
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 20.1
68% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 57.9
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 105
70% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Hynix... 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 42.7
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A8S0BU0M Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30A8S0BU0M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback