Lenovo 20HR002MGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20HR002MGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HR002MGE
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 182
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 281
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9563
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.6
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 1
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 357 354 240 251 253 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 360
Write 358
Mixed 320
SusWrite 297
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 15
81% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 325
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron L1G32D4PG107WT:B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HR002MGE Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HR002MGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback