Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard Easynote LE69KB (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EG70_KB
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131205
Uptime	32.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Memory 21.3 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 42.5 17% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 74.5 8-Core 74.8 10% 74.7 Pts	64-Core 79.5 5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0782) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.4 1% 2.27 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2160001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 197 222 236 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 292 Write 191 Mixed 167 SusWrite 214 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 11.9 40% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 122 92% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G KVR16LS11/8A-PB 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 311 13% 311 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
3.5 120GBOcz-vertex2Bench 43%, 4,046 samples	1x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 73%, 475 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	4x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16