Acer Aspire 4743

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4743  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1152 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Memory 9.89
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 50.6
16% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 45.8
8-Core 43.5
6% 44.7 Pts
64-Core 44.9
3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0559) 762MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2418
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 105 51 64 24 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 206
SusWrite 51
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 0.4
29% 68 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 93%
ST9500325AS 500GB
449GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 14 16 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18.1
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.2
4% 1.23 GB/s
Latency 405
10% 405 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4743 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4743

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback