Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X570-ACE  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 144
2-Core 291
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1120
98% 834 Pts
64-Core 2,867
177% 2,867 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 82.8
73% 87.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79
Splatting 71.6
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 403 402 67 46 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 499
Write 388
Mixed 376
SusWrite 216
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 17.8
96% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 24.9
54% 108 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 102%
Intel SSDSC2KB960G8 960GB
700GB free
Firmware: XCV10120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 415 416 418 420 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 311
Write 327
Mixed 350
SusWrite 403
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 34.9
120% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
147% 194 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 32.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 29.4
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X570-ACE Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback