Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 14:19
Run Duration504 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 916
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2285
141% 2285 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 197
Parallax 205
146% 194 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 186
Splatting 130
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 1420 1368 1319 1340 858 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,167
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,584
SusWrite 1,282
378% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 66.5
228% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 619
478% 659 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 266%
Great: 431%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 2079 2073 2053 1496 1476 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,230
Write 2,072
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 1,828
443% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 72.7
258% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 700
534% 729 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 313%
Great: 431%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 468 466 456 467 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 454
Mixed 429
SusWrite 464
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 45.5
157% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 455 454 455 460 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 456
Mixed 402
SusWrite 454
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 45.4
158% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 2111 1855 1522 1532 1537 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2250
Write 2,078
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 1,593
430% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 73.4
258% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 704
535% 727 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 300%
Great: 372%
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 199 195 198 202 200 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 93%
Samsung D3 Station 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 6127
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 202 204 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 183
Write 136
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 201
195% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
121% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 36.4
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback