Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 202 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 691 67% 551 Pts	64-Core 865 54% 865 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397D); MSI Venture 2x 3060 CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.4% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 117 Parallax 120 103% 121 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 101 Splatting 88.3 87% 109 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 166 167 165 168 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 447 Mixed 384 SusWrite 199 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 53.5 173% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 352 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 102GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 81.2 Write 83.3 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 70.2 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB 1,490 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 56GB free Firmware: V56OA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 40 41 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 41.6 Write 36.1 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 41.2 27% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 40%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB 1,867 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 111GB free Firmware: 02.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 47 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 44.4 Write 44.1 Mixed 35.4 SusWrite 45.8 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 44%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 640GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free, PID 60c4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 41 44 40 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 13.7 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 41.7 40% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 38%
WDC WD10 TPVT-00U4RT1 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 40GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 45.2 Write 52.4 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 54 65% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2200 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.6% Good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 22.6 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 21.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	190x
Core i7-5930KIntel $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	27x
Core i7-5960XIntel $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	40x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	14x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	7x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 2,352 samples	6x
8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 4x4GBMicronBench 91%, 1,465 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $590

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16