Lenovo 6674CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 6674CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Tilapia CRB
Memory4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 41
2-Core 78.9
38% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 79.2
8-Core 78.5
11% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 256GB 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 162 163 159 155 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 184
Write 168
Mixed 127
SusWrite 159
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 15.9
54% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 26.4
22% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 187%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
204GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 119 122 122 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 106
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 120
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.8
220% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773SB0-CK0 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 6674CTO Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 6674CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback