Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer TravelMate P249-G2-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lynx_SK
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 07:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 111
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 170
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1133) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 129 140 106 102 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 418
Write 273
Mixed 324
SusWrite 130
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 31.5
119% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 198
168% 244 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
660GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 17 12 6.1 13 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P249-G2-M Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback