Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090701
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 95.4 46% 72.1 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 190 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 108 68 14 48 30 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.7% Poor	Read 217 Write 200 Mixed 169 SusWrite 70.2 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 10.8 46% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 17.2 13% 17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 56%
WD WD2000BB-22GUC0 200GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 33GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 31 31 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 30.9 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 31.6 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 32%
WD WD1600BEVE-00WZT0 160GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 122GB free Firmware: 01.04A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 32 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 27.1 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 31%
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60 3,340 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 78GB free Firmware: 3.CDE SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 34 35 35 36 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 29.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 35.1 21% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 24%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 234GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 82 82 82 83 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 78.9 Write 36.5 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 82.8 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 60%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 344GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 109 Write 29.7 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 27.3 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	132x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16