MSI MS-14F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 82% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star Summit E14FlipEvo A12MT
MotherboardMSI MS-14F1  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 82%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 66.4
1-Core 196
2-Core 389
111% 217 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,032
98% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 131F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 32.9
21% 29.3 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 25.4
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1032 1TB
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3814 4183 3939 1895 1928 1920 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 3,161
Write 4,048
Mixed 2,976
SusWrite 2,947
742% 3,283 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 107
390% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1303
DQ Mixed 1,470
1,114% 1,508 MB/s
Poor: 288%
This bench: 494%
Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 59
MC Write 52
MC Mixed 53.3
156% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 27.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 141%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14F1 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-14F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback