Acer Veriton M6660G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M6660G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6660G(DCH)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 708
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1403 MHz, MLim: 1587 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 473.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 86.4
0% 53.3 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 66.4
58% 71.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 354 353 316 230 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 544
Mixed 712
SusWrite 314
145% 651 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 53.6
179% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 626
481% 647 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 145%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 86D3 SP008GBLFU266B02 86D3 SP008GBLFU266B02 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M6660G Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6660G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback