| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | HP CQ2903ESm (all builds) |
| Motherboard | PEGATRON 2AE2 |
| Memory | 6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20120831 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '22 at 16:20 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G550T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
50%
Average
|
51% 81.1 Pts
|
15% 115 Pts
|
7% 112 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AE2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2828
|
0.7%
Terrible
|
1% 0.9 fps
|
1% 0.83 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 116 107 104 121 115 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
101% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.7 4.9 4.7 5.3 5 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
14% 13.6 MB/s
|
167% 3.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.5%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
50% 79.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CQ2903ESm Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP CQ2903ESm
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |