Biostar A960D+V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+V3 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 122 54% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 141 26% 179 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 37.8 30% 38.2 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 136 59 42 47 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 219GB free Firmware: JU001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 88 87 90 90 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 138 Write 121 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 89.3 67% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 79%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2TB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 23.6 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 23.5 31% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 124% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 8.8 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	30x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	25x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	14x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
NFS011SA356-6007200 256GBBench 56%, 274 samples	5x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	30x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16