HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 166
56% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 466
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 214 244 181 158 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 363
Write 318
Mixed 210
SusWrite 211
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 20.2
78% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 61.6
53% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
150GB free
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 172 177 175 175 250 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.1% Good
Read 257
Write 243
Mixed 154
SusWrite 184
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 29.5
121% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 71.9
88% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 90%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
90GB free
Firmware: 07TA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 191 177 190 189 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 391
Write 255
Mixed 247
SusWrite 196
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 14.6
91% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 23.3
43% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E2 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E2 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback