Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170925
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '17 at 16:26
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 946
84% 711 Pts
64-Core 2,648
164% 2,648 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3364) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 147
Parallax 135
114% 141 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 139
Splatting 110
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,501
Mixed 1,257
352% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 18.3
113% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 36.4
41% 71 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 208%
Great: 302%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 133
Write 148
Mixed 157
111% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2.02
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.27
150% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 104%
WL4000GSA6472 4.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 148
Mixed 140
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.26
81% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
982GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 118
Write 96.4
Mixed 85.1
75% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.15
65% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 83%
WL4000GSA6472 5TB
907GB free
Firmware: X4.X0C.2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 101
Write 130
Mixed 75
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 83%
WL4000GSA6472 4.5TB
844GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 137
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.18
48% 0.43 MB/s
10GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 143
Write 20.7
Mixed 30.8
59% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.76
88% 5.56 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3003 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
176% Outstanding
MC Read 71.6
MC Write 71.5
MC Mixed 69.3
202% 70.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 25.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 176%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $841
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback