MSI MS-17Q1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive564% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77 12UHS
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q1  (all builds)
Memory119.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 11:36
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 210
2-Core 404
118% 229 Pts
4-Core 803
8-Core 1,427
134% 1,115 Pts
64-Core 2,648
164% 2,648 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1362) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.89% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 231
Parallax 11.3
8% 84.1 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3266 3147 3308 3206 3323 3283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
564% Outstanding
Read 4,910
Write 4,962
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 3,255
799% 3,575 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 81.1
286% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 2,131
DQ Write 1,521
DQ Mixed 1,690
1,299% 1,781 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 564%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 40.5
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17Q1 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback